🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to lift a lower court's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and upsetting the delicate balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to use the maps established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action is part of a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, Democratic representatives decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior Democratic figure said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by upholding a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.